🔧 Update search worker initialization to use Vite's ?worker syntax for proper bundling and improve error handling
This commit is contained in:
@@ -402,24 +402,25 @@ let searchWorkerRequestId = 0;
|
||||
const initSearchWorker = () => {
|
||||
if (!searchWorker) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const workerUrl = new URL('../workers/search.worker.js', import.meta.url);
|
||||
console.log('🔧 Creating worker with URL:', workerUrl.href);
|
||||
searchWorker = new Worker(workerUrl, { type: 'module' });
|
||||
// Use Vite's ?worker syntax for proper bundling
|
||||
import('../workers/search.worker.js?worker').then(module => {
|
||||
searchWorker = new module.default();
|
||||
console.log('✅ Worker created successfully');
|
||||
|
||||
searchWorker.onmessage = handleSearchWorkerMessage;
|
||||
searchWorker.onerror = error => {
|
||||
console.error(
|
||||
'❌ Worker error:',
|
||||
error.message,
|
||||
error.filename,
|
||||
error.lineno
|
||||
);
|
||||
console.error('❌ Worker error:', error.message);
|
||||
operationProgress.value.active = false;
|
||||
operationProgress.value.message = 'Search error: ' + error.message;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
console.log('✅ Worker event handlers attached');
|
||||
}).catch(error => {
|
||||
console.error('❌ Failed to import worker:', error);
|
||||
operationProgress.value.active = false;
|
||||
operationProgress.value.message = 'Failed to initialize search';
|
||||
searchWorker = null;
|
||||
});
|
||||
} catch (error) {
|
||||
console.error('❌ Failed to create worker:', error);
|
||||
operationProgress.value.active = false;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user